Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed May 29 02:09:35 EDT 2019

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Indeed.

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:07 PM Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz>
wrote:

> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > Having a single locals() call de-optimize an entire function would be
> > far from ideal.
>
> I don't see what would be so bad about that. The vast majority
> of functions have no need for locals().
>
> --
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
-- 
--Guido (mobile)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190528/8e7b2b4e/attachment-0001.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list