[Python-ideas] For-loop variable scope: simultaneous possession and ingestion of cake
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sun Oct 5 02:38:12 CEST 2008
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sun Oct 5 02:38:12 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] For-loop variable scope: simultaneous possession and ingestion of cake
- Next message: [Python-ideas] For-loop variable scope: simultaneous possession and ingestion of cake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote: > Or perhaps a different proposal: > Def statements close over variables, as currently. > Lambda expression close over values, as some people seem to expect them > to. I don't think it would be a good idea to make defs and lambdas have different behaviour, because they're not interchangeable otherwise. If you're forced to use a def because what you want can't be done in a lambda, you'd be forced to accept different binding behaviour as well. Also, I'm not convinced that people think of defs and lambdas as differing like that. I suspect that they would have the same expectation if a def were written inside the loop instead of a lambda. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] For-loop variable scope: simultaneous possession and ingestion of cake
- Next message: [Python-ideas] For-loop variable scope: simultaneous possession and ingestion of cake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list