[Python-ideas] Access to function objects
Ben Finney
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Tue Aug 9 02:09:23 CEST 2011
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Tue Aug 9 02:09:23 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Access to function objects
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Access to function objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes: > To me it just means that __func__ will remain esoteric, which is just > fine with me. I wouldn't be surprised if there were use cases where it > was *desirable* to have a way (from the inside) to access the > undecorated function (somewhat similar to the thing with modules > below). Perhaps I misunderstand the functionality, but: The ability to access the undecorated function would be of great help in our Django-based project. Django is very decorator-happy, and we are trying to introspect code and, given a particular URL, determine the innermost function (more precisely, what location in our code) that actually handles that URL. Is that a use-case of interest? -- \ “Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code | `\ will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.” —John | _o__) F. Woods | Ben Finney
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Access to function objects
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Access to function objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list