[Python-ideas] A concurrency survey of sorts
Mike Meyer
mwm at mired.org
Fri Nov 4 20:02:06 CET 2011
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Fri Nov 4 20:02:06 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] A concurrency survey of sorts
- Next message: [Python-ideas] A concurrency survey of sorts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Weeble <clockworksaint at gmail.com> wrote: > I just want to be sure - the idea of removing the threading module > sounds ludicrous. It's not getting serious consideration, is it? Removing the threading module - as part of a change that includes providing some other concurrent processing facility - seems like a reasonable enough idea that I'll be including it in the sequel. Rewriting it to use those facilities might be reasonable for backwards compatibility, but the new facilities should have enough advantages that new code would just use them. <mike
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] A concurrency survey of sorts
- Next message: [Python-ideas] A concurrency survey of sorts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list