[Python-ideas] List Revolution
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sun Sep 11 00:34:45 CEST 2011
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sun Sep 11 00:34:45 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] List Revolution
- Next message: [Python-ideas] List Revolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Christopher King <g.nius.ck at gmail.com> wrote: > I think there is some confusion about my idea (I didn't intend it as a joke, > but I was unsure, I was really surprised when Guido endorsed. I think people > have been thinking that my idea was as follows: >>>> items=['a', 'b', 'c'] >>>> items.first > 'a' >>>> items.second > 'b' >>>> items.third > 'c' > It is not that. I would not want it to be in words. That would be dumb what > my idea was was this: >>>> items=['a', 'b', 'c'] >>>> items[1] > 'a' >>>> items[2] > 'b' >>>> items[3] > 'c' > I'm not sure if this one is good, but if not, I'm sure you we come up with > another line of jokes (I like jokes, so its alright.) I understood that. -- I think others did too but found the proposal so preposterous that they started posting nonsensical "solutions" based on an intentionally literalistic misreading of your original post. (If you think this is odd, realize that Python was named after Monty Python's Flying Circus -- we occasionally like to show off our warped sense of humor. :-) Anyway, the reason your proposal is not going to fly, quite apart of whether it would be a good idea for a brand new language design(*), is that there is over 20 years of existing Python code that would have to be changed, not to mention the brains of millions of users, and hundreds of books about Python. Plus pretty much every other language in widespread use today (C, C++, Java, C#, JavaScript, Ruby, to name a few; presumably also Objective C given its C inheritance) agrees that indexes start at zero. It is a cultural battle that has been fought and won long ago (all the old languages used 1-based indexing: Fortran, Algol, Pascal) and it's really not that important in the grand scheme of things, so the status quo wins. (*) I personally think 0-based indexing is better, and the referenced EWD expresses why better than I could. But I'm sure that if we lived in a world where 1-based indexing was the norm I'd get by just fine. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] List Revolution
- Next message: [Python-ideas] List Revolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list