Jim Jewett jimjjewett at gmail.com
Thu Sep 22 18:06:43 CEST 2011

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] truncate sequences in pretty-print ?
• Next message: [Python-ideas] static vs atdef, etc
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:

> * I'm sorry but the keyword atdef is ugly. The only proposal I like is
> static, but I agree that it only makes sense to someone with a C-type
> background.

Even with a C background, static is a bad choice, because it has
already been used for too many different meanings.  (Admittedly, not
all in C.)

-jJ

---

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] truncate sequences in pretty-print ?
• Next message: [Python-ideas] static vs atdef, etc
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list