[Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Mon Sep 26 13:33:52 CEST 2011
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Mon Sep 26 13:33:52 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 26 September 2011 07:56, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > So, your proposed use of 'nonlocal' would actually be declaring > a name to be *local*. That strikes me as weird and perverse. Aha! That's precisely the concern I had with the suggestion of "nonlocal" for this, although I had failed to understand *why* it bothered me, and so hadn't commented... Paul
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list