[Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Tue Sep 27 16:57:33 CEST 2011
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Tue Sep 27 16:57:33 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 September 2011 05:12, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> "our" is something in Perl, right? My proposal was "own", which is >> much older (Algol-60). Probably nobody else here remembers it. > > I do :-) > > Not sure that Algol-60 using it is a good enough reason for > recommending it, though. The name didn't make sense to me even back > then... (Actually, after this discussion, the logic is clearer - so > congratulations, Nick, for clarifying a 40-year old puzzle for me!) In the days of Algol-60 they were pretty bad at explaining things. I was puzzled by "own" as well. (However, the biggest mystery for me, for a long time, were pointers in Pascal. It didn't clear up until I learned assembly.) > Call by name, anyone? ABC, Python's predecessor, had it, IIRC. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Tweaking closures and lexical scoping to include the function being defined
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list