Eli Bendersky eliben at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 14:22:44 CET 2012

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] Docstrings for namedtuple
• Next message: [Python-ideas] Docstrings for namedtuple
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com>wrote:

> What interface is better for specifying namedtuple field docstrings?
>
>     Point = namedtuple('Point', 'x y',
>                        doc='Point: 2-dimensional coordinate',
>                        field_docs=['abscissa', 'ordinate'])
>
> or
>
>     Point = namedtuple('Point', [('x', 'absciss'), ('y', 'ordinate')],
>                        doc='Point: 2-dimensional coordinate')
>
> ?
>
>
This may be a good time to say that personally I always disliked
namedtuple's creation syntax. It is unpleasant in two respects:

1. You have to repeat the name
2. You have to specify the fields in a space-separated string

I wish there was an alternative of something like:

@namedtuple
class Point:
  x = 0
  y = 0

Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20121216/80cf1a35/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] Docstrings for namedtuple
• Next message: [Python-ideas] Docstrings for namedtuple
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list