[Python-ideas] async: feedback on EventLoop API
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Tue Dec 18 23:51:05 CET 2012
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Tue Dec 18 23:51:05 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] async: feedback on EventLoop API
- Next message: [Python-ideas] async: feedback on EventLoop API
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Richard Oudkerk <shibturn at gmail.com> wrote: > polling.py in the proactor branch already had an implementation of > socketpair() for Windows;-) D'oh! And it always uses sockets for the "self-pipe". That makes sense. > Also note that on Windows a connecting socket needs to be added to wfds > *and* xfds when you do > > ... = select(rfds, wfds, xfds, timeout) > > If the connection fails then the handle is reported as being exceptional but > *not* writable. But SelectProactor in proactor.py doesn't seem to do this. > It might make sense to have add_connector()/remove_connector() which on Unix > is just an alias for add_writer()/remove_writer(). This would be useful if > tulip ever has a loop based on WSAPoll() for Windows (Vista and later), > since WSAPoll() has an awkward bug concerning asynchronous connects. Can't we do this for all writers? (If we have to make a distinction, so be it, but it seems easy to have latent bugs if some platforms require you to make a different call but others don't care either way.) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] async: feedback on EventLoop API
- Next message: [Python-ideas] async: feedback on EventLoop API
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list