[Python-ideas] [Python-Dev] hello, new dict addition for new eve ?
Devin Jeanpierre
jeanpierreda at gmail.com
Sun Jan 1 09:40:01 CET 2012
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sun Jan 1 09:40:01 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] [Python-Dev] hello, new dict addition for new eve ?
- Next message: [Python-ideas] [Python-Dev] hello, new dict addition for new eve ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > You mean like dict.update? Nah nah, that's "+= "; "+" is dict(d1, **d2). -- Devin On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > On 12/31/2011 5:57 PM, Nathan Schneider wrote: > >> The necessary resolution of key conflicts is what makes "+" feel less >> natural to me for dicts than it does for sequences, where the order of >> the operands is transparently reflected in the output. For dicts, in >> contrast, we are talking about a "lossy" union/combination where what >> is lost depends on the order of the operands—this is less transparent >> in the output. However it is spelled, though, I would be thrilled if >> such an operation were built in. :) > > > You mean like dict.update? > > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] [Python-Dev] hello, new dict addition for new eve ?
- Next message: [Python-ideas] [Python-Dev] hello, new dict addition for new eve ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list