[Python-ideas] doctest
Devin Jeanpierre
jeanpierreda at gmail.com
Fri Mar 2 18:59:43 CET 2012
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Fri Mar 2 18:59:43 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] doctest
- Next message: [Python-ideas] doctest
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > Devin, > > You need to start writing real code rather than continue to tell us > that the problems are minor and easily fixable, and the solutions are > uncontroversial. To those who have tried and thought about it, the > problems are *not* easy to solve , except for some superficial edge > cases that you and other critics of doctest keep focusing on. I already did write real code. In the context of this discussion, I implemented a +LITERAL_EVAL flag. Was there something else I was supposed to write, other than the solution I advocated? ;) https://bitbucket.org/devin.jeanpierre/doctest2/src/e084a682ccbc/doctest2/constants.py#cl-122 > And please don't propose that we change the behavior of dict or other > data types itself, or add new APIs to objects just for the purpose of > "fixing" doctest's issues. I would never dream of it. That's pretty obscene. -- Devin
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] doctest
- Next message: [Python-ideas] doctest
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list