[Python-ideas] My objections to implicit package directories
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Mon Mar 26 16:57:37 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Mon Mar 26 16:57:37 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] My objections to implicit package directories
- Next message: [Python-ideas] My objections to implicit package directories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com> wrote: > Yes. On what platform are you? On unixy platforms filename extensions are just a naming convention that can just as easily be used with directories. IIUC that's how almost all filesystems treat them. However desktop software often assigns specific meanings to them -- the user can configure these, but there's a large set of predefined bindings too, and many key applications also play this game (since there is, frankly, not much else to go by -- some important file types are not easily guessable by reading their content, either because it's some esoteric binary format, or because it's something too universal, like XML). I know that's how it works on Windows and Mac, but I believe the Linux desktop things (the things I kill off or at lest ignore as soon as I log in :-) have the same idea. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] My objections to implicit package directories
- Next message: [Python-ideas] My objections to implicit package directories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list