[Python-ideas] Is there a good reason to use * for multiplication?
MRAB
python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Sat Oct 13 00:57:30 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sat Oct 13 00:57:30 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Is there a good reason to use * for multiplication?
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Is there a good reason to use * for multiplication?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2012-10-12 22:37, Ethan Furman wrote: > Ram Rachum wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> Today a funny thought occurred to me. Ever since I've learned to program >> when I was a child, I've taken for granted that when programming, the >> sign used for multiplication is *. But now that I think about it, why? >> Now that we have Unicode, why not use · ? > Why not use × ? > Because it is too easy to confuse · with . > Because it is too easy to confuse × with x > Because it is not solving a problem. > Ditto. > Because it would still take work, and then easily cause confusion. > Ditto. > > <aside> > In college we dropped the · and just wrote stuff like: > > (x + z)(x - y) > > but we can't do that in Python because they are function calls. > </aside> > > > In short, I don't see it happening. > Ditto.
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Is there a good reason to use * for multiplication?
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Is there a good reason to use * for multiplication?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list