[Python-ideas] A subclassing API for named tuples?
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Fri Feb 15 08:07:00 CET 2013
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Fri Feb 15 08:07:00 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] A subclassing API for named tuples?
- Next message: [Python-ideas] A subclassing API for named tuples?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:11:38 -0800 Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > On 02/14/2013 05:19 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > A recurring suggestion for collections.namedtuple is that it would be > > nice to be able to define them like this [...] > > FWIW, I think namedtuple is overused. Not that there's anything > innately wrong with namedtuple; it's just that I think too many types > are iterable which shouldn't be. (Nobody unpacks the stat_result > anymore, that's like 1995 man.) I suggest people use > types.SimpleNamespace unless iterability is specifically required. There are tons of cases where tuple unpacking is a very convenient API. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] A subclassing API for named tuples?
- Next message: [Python-ideas] A subclassing API for named tuples?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list