Serhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Mon May 20 14:39:05 CEST 2013

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] Implicit string literal concatenation considered harmful (options)
• Next message: [Python-ideas] Implicit string literal concatenation considered harmful (options)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

19.05.13 21:58, Mark Janssen написав(ла):
>> We can't just "remove implicit concatenation", because that will break code
>> which is currently working perfectly. And probably it will break more
>> working code than it will fix unnoticed broken code.
>
> Really?  Isn't the number of programs breaking roughly equal to 2, perhaps less?

One is Python interpreter itself. What is other one?

---

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] Implicit string literal concatenation considered harmful (options)
• Next message: [Python-ideas] Implicit string literal concatenation considered harmful (options)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list