[Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Fri Apr 4 10:54:07 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Fri Apr 4 10:54:07 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This proposal strikes me as conceptually disordered. A set is not ordered. An ordered set would be a sequence, and if you want a sequence, the best thing is to use a sequence object. A dict is a set of key,value pairs. If you want an ordered sequence of key, value pairs, use a sequence. OrderedDicts were added for situations where that is not possible because a pre-existing api requires a mapping object, even though you might prefer to use a sequence. Passing a sequence of key,value pairs is a case that requires a mapping. If a function attends to the order of key,value pairs it receives, it should receive a sequence of such. **kwds in a call is a substitute for writing out unordered key=value specifications. The function may or may not have **kargs in its signature and if it does, the kargs received may or may not be equal to the kwds passed. -- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list