[Python-ideas] Add stop=exception option to next() (was Re: PEP 479 and take())
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sun Dec 14 03:31:11 CET 2014
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sun Dec 14 03:31:11 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Add stop=exception option to next() (was Re: PEP 479 and take())
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Add stop=exception option to next() (was Re: PEP 479 and take())
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Raymond Hettinger < raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > For Christmas, it would be a nice gift if Guido could put an end to this > line of thinking. The conversations are difficult because several of the > participants are deeply convinced that there is something fundamentally > wrong with StopIteration. I don't think any of them can easily be > convinced to the leave the iterator protocol alone and to continue enjoying > one of our best success stories. > It ends with PEP 479. I have no intention to let this go any further. I am now going to mute any further threads on the topic, and I recommend you do the same, Raymond. Happy holidays! -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20141213/397c287e/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Add stop=exception option to next() (was Re: PEP 479 and take())
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Add stop=exception option to next() (was Re: PEP 479 and take())
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list