Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Feb 20 22:58:30 CET 2014

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] decorator syntax limitation
• Next message: [Python-ideas] decorator syntax limitation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 21 February 2014 07:55, Jan Kaliszewski <zuo at chopin.edu.pl> wrote:
>
> As far as I remember, generally, the belief that this restriction
> is necessary seemed not to be very strong.

Yup, but the gains aren't that great, either - it's never irritated
anyone enough for them to write up the necessary PEP and implement the
Grammar change :)

Cheers,
Nick.


-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

---

• Previous message: [Python-ideas] decorator syntax limitation
• Next message: [Python-ideas] decorator syntax limitation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list