[Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
MRAB
python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Thu Mar 20 03:42:54 CET 2014
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Thu Mar 20 03:42:54 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order (was: Re: OrderedDict literals)
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2014-03-20 01:58, Andrew Barnert wrote:> On Mar 19, 2014, at 16:32, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hopefully I'll have time to write a proto-PEP on this in the next >> couple weeks, but the gist is that I see 2 options: > > Last time around, someone suggested that ***kwargs could get you the > args as a list of pairs, or maybe an OrderedDict. While that would > require a bit of complexity in the CALL_FUNCTION code, it seems like > it would be simpler than your option 2. > > But it doesn't solve the main problem. Right now, you can forward > any arguments perfectly by doing this: > > def wrapper(*args, **kwargs): > return wrappee(*args, **kwargs) > > Your option 2 would require much more verbose code to forward > perfectly. The triple-star idea makes it a lot nicer (assuming that > ** passing respects the order, or a new *** is added there as well), > but it would still break the thousands of wrapper functions out > there written with **kwargs. > Wouldn't it be a problem only if the dict were unpacked and then repacked? In the code above, it's merely passing the input kwargs on to 'wrappee'.
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order (was: Re: OrderedDict literals)
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Preserving **kwargs order
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list