[Python-ideas] PEP 479: Change StopIteration handling inside generators
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Sun Nov 16 02:21:48 CET 2014
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sun Nov 16 02:21:48 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] PEP 479: Change StopIteration handling inside generators
- Next message: [Python-ideas] PEP 479: Change StopIteration handling inside generators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Rob Cliffe <rob.cliffe at btinternet.com> wrote: > On 15/11/2014 09:29, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> PEP: 479 >> Title: Change StopIteration handling inside generators > > Thanks Chris for volunteering to do the donkey work again. > I think the final draft of the PEP would be much more comprehensible and > useful if it contained one or more examples illustrating how the old and new > behaviour differ. I realise that this may not be appropriate until a > consensus has been reached on what exactly the new behaviour *is*, so > apologies if my grandmother already intends to suck this particular egg. Agreed. And agreed on the analysis; I can't add examples till I know for sure what I'm adding examples _of_. The latest edit expanded on the details of the proposals, so it now may be possible to consider examples, but possibly we're still bikeshedding the nature of the proposals themselves. Correction. We're DEFINITELY still bikeshedding etc etc, but possibly we're still doing so to the extent that it's not worth adding examples yet. :) ChrisA
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] PEP 479: Change StopIteration handling inside generators
- Next message: [Python-ideas] PEP 479: Change StopIteration handling inside generators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list