[Python-ideas] Concurrency Modules
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Jul 26 16:19:40 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sun Jul 26 16:19:40 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Concurrency Modules
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Concurrency Modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 25 July 2015 at 15:32, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Steve Dower <Steve.Dower at microsoft.com> wrote: >> Hope that makes sense and I'm not stretching things too far. Guess I should >> make this into a talk for PyCon next year. > > Yes. And serve cake. > > On a more serious note, I'd like to see some throughput tests for > process-pool, thread-pool, and asyncio on a single thread. That'd make > a great PyCon talk; make sure it's videoed, as I'd likely be linking > to it a lot. Dave Beazley's "Python Concurrency from the Ground Up" talk at PyCon US this year was almost exactly that: https://us.pycon.org/2015/schedule/presentation/374/ Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCs5OvhV9S4 Demo code: https://github.com/dabeaz/concurrencylive There's a direct causal link between that talk and our renewed interest in getting subinterpreters up to a point where they can offer most of the low overhead of interpreter threads with most of the memory safety of operating system level processes :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Concurrency Modules
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Concurrency Modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list