[Python-ideas] slice.literal notation
Joseph Jevnik
joejev at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 00:30:22 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Thu Jun 11 00:30:22 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] slice.literal notation
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] slice.literal notation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Do you think that the dropping '.literal' is worth the change in behaviour? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > David Mertz wrote: > > This >> patch proposes the following change: >> >> slice.literal >> > > It would be even nicer if the slice class itself > implemented the [] syntax: > > myslice = slice[1:2] > > -- > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150610/c5a1a5f8/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] slice.literal notation
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] slice.literal notation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list