[Python-ideas] Function composition (was no subject)
David Mertz
mertz at gnosis.cx
Sat May 9 20:30:17 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sat May 9 20:30:17 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Function composition (was no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Function composition (was no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:38:38AM -0400, Ron Adam wrote: > > > How about an operator for partial? > > > > root @ mean @ map $ square(xs) > I have trouble seeing the advantage of a special function composition operator when it is easy to write a general 'compose()' function that can produce such things easily enough. E.g. in a white paper I just did for O'Reilly on _Functional Programming in Python_ I propose this little example implementation: def compose(*funcs): "Return a new function s.t. compose(f,g,...)(x) == f(g(...(x)))" def inner(data, funcs=funcs): result = data for f in reversed(funcs): result = f(result) return result return inner Which we might use as: RMS = compose(root, mean, square) result = RMS(my_array) -- Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting advocates of freedom in prisons. Intellectual property is to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150509/dc548e12/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Function composition (was no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Function composition (was no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list