[Python-ideas] PEP 505 (None coalescing operators) thoughts
Ryan Gonzalez
rymg19 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 02:39:11 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Wed Sep 30 02:39:11 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 505 (None coalescing operators) thoughts
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 505 (None coalescing operators) thoughts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
What about 'otherwise'? x = a otherwise b On September 29, 2015 6:57:39 PM CDT, Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas <python-ideas at python.org> wrote: >LOn Sep 29, 2015, at 16:27, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> >wrote: >> >> Emile van Sebille wrote: >> >>> x = foo nor 'foo was None' >> >> Cute, but unfortunately it conflicts with established >> usage of the word 'nor', which would suggest that >> a nor b == not (a or b). > >Agreed. If this is going to be a keyword rather than a symbol, it >really has to read like English, or at least like abbreviated English, >with the right meaning--something like "foo, falling back to 'foo was >None' if needed". Something that reads like English with a completely >different meaning is a bad idea. > >_______________________________________________ >Python-ideas mailing list >Python-ideas at python.org >https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ -- Sent from my Nexus 5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. CURRENTLY LISTENING TO: Vermilion Fire (Final Fantasy Type-0) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150929/48533780/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 505 (None coalescing operators) thoughts
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 505 (None coalescing operators) thoughts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list