[Python-ideas] Smoothing transition to Python 3
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 15:28:07 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sat Jun 4 15:28:07 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Smoothing transition to Python 3
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Smoothing transition to Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4 June 2016 at 12:34, Neil Schemenauer <nas-pythonideas at arctrix.com> wrote: > On 2016-06-04, Paul Moore wrote: >> Who do you propose develops that version? Will you do so to help the >> next group of people in your situation? > > I'm proposing to help. Here is a very early start: > > https://github.com/nascheme/ppython Cool! >> But the people who've asked for such a thing in the past have >> apparently never been sufficiently convinced it was a worthwhile >> effort to put their own time into it. > > Given the choice of porting your code to Python 3 or developing this > transitional Python to help you, it is easy to see why people choose > the former option. However, if you look at the millions of lines of > Python 2 code that is yet to be ported, I think the idea has some merit. Sounds like you know where you want to go with this, I hope you get the interest to keep the project going. I can't say I'd recommend people go this route myself, but maybe that's because I'm not looking at projects on the scale you are - typically the things I've been involved in haven't been that hard to port (I work mostly on libraries, and working in the common Python 2/3 subset, with the aid of libraries like six, has been a perfectly practical solution for me). Paul
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Smoothing transition to Python 3
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Smoothing transition to Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list