Koos Zevenhoven k7hoven at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 11:48:24 EDT 2016

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Working with Path objects: p-strings?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Working with Path objects: p-strings?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de> wrote:
> offtopic
>
> I wonder if it would be possible/necessary for the stdlib to include a set
> of libraries marked as "featured". Not like "provisional" but more like "You
> should use this one and be aware that it may upgrade faster than normal
> stdlib modules".
>
> Basically like a "pull module". Just a third-party module pulled from the
> source and upgraded with each Python version. That would maintain the
> maintainers flexibility and the increase the availability of these "defacto
> stdlib" modules.
>

+1.

It is a different thing to find a random module on PyPI and depend on
it, than to depend on something that is ~officially recommended. Or
maybe some kind of package reputation system on PyPI? More threads? :)

- Koos

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Working with Path objects: p-strings?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Working with Path objects: p-strings?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list