[Python-ideas] a sorting protocol dunder method?
Nathan Schneider
neatnate at gmail.com
Sun Dec 3 18:46:45 EST 2017
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Sun Dec 3 18:46:45 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] a sorting protocol dunder method?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] a sorting protocol dunder method?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Chris Barker <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote: > In fact, it's striking me that there may well be classes that are defining > the comparison magic methods not because they want the objects to "work" > with the comparison operators, but because that want them to work with sort > and min, and max, and... > An existence proof: in NLTK, an __lt__ method added purely to facilitate consistent sorting (in doctests) of structured data objects for which comparison operators do not really make conceptual sense: https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/1902/files#diff-454368f06fd635b1e06c9bb6d65bd19bR689 Granted, calling min() and max() on collections of these objects would not make conceptual sense either. Still, __sort_key__ would have been cleaner than __lt__. Cheers, Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20171203/af7983da/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] a sorting protocol dunder method?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] a sorting protocol dunder method?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list