[Python-ideas] Python reviewed
Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 20:26:00 EST 2017
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Mon Jan 9 20:26:00 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Python reviewed
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Python reviewed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Simon Lovell <simon58500 at bigpond.com> wrote: > Re: Colons. I'm sure I've seen that FAQ before. I may be arrogant but I > can't take it seriously. Being "slightly" easier to read is hardly a reason > for a mandatory structure. > "Readability counts." Did you notice that you placed a redundant ":"s in every comment of yours after "Re"? I don't think your message would look better without them. Another advantage of having : is that it allows smart editors to detect and highlight errors sooner and to better perform auto-indentation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20170109/3f53fca3/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Python reviewed
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Python reviewed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list