[Python-ideas] Ideas for improving the struct module
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Thu Jan 19 19:53:46 EST 2017
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Thu Jan 19 19:53:46 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Ideas for improving the struct module
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Ideas for improving the struct module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:16:28AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> To be fair, the name "struct" implies a C-style structure, which >> _does_ have a fixed size, or at least fixed offsets for its members > > > Ah, the old "everyone thinks in C terms" fallacy raises its ugly head > agan :-) > > The name doesn't imply any such thing to me, or those who haven't been > raised on C. It implies the word "structure", which has no implication > of being fixed-width. Fair point. Objection retracted - and it was only minor anyway. This would be a handy feature to add. +1. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Ideas for improving the struct module
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Ideas for improving the struct module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list