[Python-ideas] "Immutable Builder" Pattern and Operator
Random832
random832 at fastmail.com
Mon Jan 23 09:25:48 EST 2017
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Mon Jan 23 09:25:48 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] "Immutable Builder" Pattern and Operator
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] "Immutable Builder" Pattern and Operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 09:12, Soni L. wrote: > Builders for network connections where you don't wanna start with a > fresh builder every time. Maybe you need a builder builder. Or, more seriously, a way to differentiate the things in the 'builder' from the things that are going to be different with each connection, and pass them separately in the connection's constructor. Or a clone method. > It is far more useful only because it's not just a syntax sugar. It's > more like a completely new, standalone operator. > Which, IMO, makes it more confusing. > > I propose `x .= y` -> `x = x . y`, for any `y`. I think you're underestimating the extent to which the fact that "y" isn't a real expression will cause confusion.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] "Immutable Builder" Pattern and Operator
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] "Immutable Builder" Pattern and Operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list