Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Fri Oct 20 16:29:14 EDT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Add time.time_ns(): system clock with nanosecond resolution
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] (PEP 555 subtopic) Propagation of context in async code
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Hi francis,

Le 20 oct. 2017 18:42, "francismb" <francismb at email.de> a écrit :

Hi Victor,

On 10/13/2017 04:12 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> I would like to add:
>
> * time.time_ns()
> * time.monotonic_ns()
> * time.perf_counter_ns()
> * time.clock_gettime_ns()
> * time.clock_settime_ns()
due nano vs. pico vs. ...

why not something like (please change '_in' for what you like):

time.time_in(precision)
time.monotonic_in(precision)


If you are not aware yet, I wrote a full PEP: PEP 564. The two discussed
idea are alreafy listed in the PEP, configurable precision and
sub-nanosecond resolution. I tried to explain why I proposed time.time_ns()
in detail in the PEP:

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0564/#sub-nanosecond-resolution

You may want to join the discussion on python-dev.

Victor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20171020/c164a868/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Add time.time_ns(): system clock with nanosecond resolution
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] (PEP 555 subtopic) Propagation of context in async code
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list