Home Original page

[Python-ideas] PEP draft: context variables

Koos Zevenhoven k7hoven at gmail.com
Tue Sep 5 13:53:33 EDT 2017 
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Koos Zevenhoven <k7hoven at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't actually care if you use the latest terminology.  You seem to
> >> have a wrong idea about how PEP 550 really works (and its full
> >> semantics), because things you say here about it don't make any sense.
> >
> >
> > In PEP 550, introducing a new LogicalContext on the ExecutionContext
> affects
> > the scope of
> ​
> any_var.set(value) for *any* any_var.
> ​
> Does that not make sense?
>
> It does. But your other sentence ".. You might get close by putting
> just one variable in a LogicalContext and then nest them, but PEP 550
> does not allow this in all cases .." does not.
>

So you claim that PEP 550 does allow that in all cases? Or you don't think
that that would get close?

​––Koos​


-- 
+ Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven +
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20170905/d5029c0b/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list