אלעזר elazarg at gmail.com
Mon Sep 11 15:20:26 EDT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations, first draft
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations, first draft
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:07 PM Lukasz Langa <lukasz at langa.pl> wrote:

> This is off topic for discussion of this PEP.
>
> It would require another one (essentially an extension of PEP 484) to get
> passed for your idea to be standardized.
>

I'm not sure whether this is directed to me; so just to make it clear, I
did not propose anything here.
I will be happy for PEP 563 to be accepted as is, although the implications
of the ability to customize Python's scoping/binding rules are worth
mentioning in the PEP, regardless of whether these are considered a pro or
a con.

Elazar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20170911/65207021/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations, first draft
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations, first draft
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list