[Python-ideas] PEP 562
Ivan Levkivskyi
levkivskyi at gmail.com
Tue Sep 12 04:26:34 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list
Tue Sep 12 04:26:34 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 562
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 562
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
@Anthony > module.__getattr__ works pretty well for normal access, after being > imported by another module, but it doesn't properly trigger loading by > functions defined in the module's own namespace. The idea of my PEP is to be very simple (both semantically and in terms of implementation). This is why I don't want to add any complex logic. People who will want to use __getattr__ for lazy loading still can do this by importing submodules. @Nathaniel @INADA > The main two use cases I know of for this and PEP 549 are lazy imports > of submodules, and deprecating attributes. Yes, lazy loading seems to be a popular idea :-) I will add the simple recipe by Inada to the PEP since it will already work. @Cody > I still think the better way > to solve the custom dir() would be to change the module __dir__ > method to check if __all__ is defined and use it to generate the > result if it exists. This seems like a logical enhancement to me, > and I'm planning on writing a patch to implement this. Whether it > would be accepted is still an open issue though. This seems a reasonable rule to me, I can also make this patch if you will not have time. @Guido What do you think about the above idea? -- Ivan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20170912/3debc7f7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 562
- Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] PEP 562
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-ideas mailing list