Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Thu Sep 21 23:38:25 EDT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Hexadecimal floating literals
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Hexadecimal floating literals
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:30 PM, David Mertz <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote:

> Simply because the edge cases for working with e.g. '0xC.68p+2' in a
> hypothetical future Python are less obvious and less simple to demonstrate,
> I feel like learners will be tempted to think that using this base-2/16
> representation saves them all their approximation issues and their need
> still to use isclose() or friends.
>

Show them 1/49*49, and explain why for i < 49, (1/i)*i equals 1 (lucky
rounding).

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20170921/1a237f46/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Hexadecimal floating literals
• Next message (by thread): [Python-ideas] Hexadecimal floating literals
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list