Why is tcl broken?
Fernando Mato Mira
matomira at iname.com
Thu Jul 1 08:04:11 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 1 08:04:11 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Why is tcl broken?
- Next message (by thread): Why is tcl broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
OK. Let's dispel Lisp mith #4 and then let's get this out of comp.lang.python [economics are different than other groups, BEWARE of Netscape's scrollbar!] Paul Duffin wrote: > > > I am surprised at this because Tcl's [upvar] is simply an explicit form > > > of dynamic binding which I seem to remember is what Lisp uses. (That > > Mistake, I think I meant dynamic scoping. > (defun inner (b) > (+ a b)) > > (defun outer (a) > (inner 3)) > > (outer 2) > > A simple macro version of setq would convert from > (setq symbol '(list)) > to > (set 'symbol '(list)) All 3 the same instance of the first misconception. That's OLD, BROKEN Lisp!!
- Previous message (by thread): Why is tcl broken?
- Next message (by thread): Why is tcl broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list