Stackless & String-processing
Graham Matthews
graham at sloth.math.uga.edu
Sat Jul 17 12:09:19 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jul 17 12:09:19 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Stackless & String-processing
- Next message (by thread): Stackless & String-processing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Peters (tim_one at email.msn.com) wrote: : A nice paper on Clean parsing combinators can be downloaded as item 5 : > : Interestingly enough, the next paper on the list ("An Interpreter") declines : to use combinators for its parsing task, instead building a conventional : "by hand" recursive descent parser. Yes it's kind of strange that they don't use the combinators to build the interpreter. One of Peyton-Jones' papers has a good (but small) example of making an interpreter with combinators (it's probably the first paper of his on monads). Tim Peters (tim_one at email.msn.com) wrote: : another-two-years-and-they'll-discover-lex/yacc<wink>-ly y'rs - tim I'll take that as a BIG <wink>. Once you use these combinators you will never go back to lex/yacc (unless you want LALR(n) grammars). graham -- The girls is all salty, the boys is all sweet, the food ain't too shabby an' they piss in the streets In France, way down in France, way on down, way on down in France
- Previous message (by thread): Stackless & String-processing
- Next message (by thread): Stackless & String-processing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list