Language extensibility (was: Why is tcl broken?)
wil blake
wblake at fau.campuscw.net
Tue Jul 6 23:03:44 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jul 6 23:03:44 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Language extensibility (was: Why is tcl broken?)
- Next message (by thread): Language extensibility (was: Why is tcl broken?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Browne wrote in message <9kgf3.301$F7.23516 at news3.giganews.com>... >Yes, please. If there's relationship between Forth and Lisp, it does >not lie in the Scheme direction. >I don't remember seeing any indication of Moore having encountered >Lisp; if so, that is very interesting. In the Special Forth issue from Byte Magazine(August 1980?) an article ("The Evolution of Forth, and Unusual Language"?) quoting Chuck Moore has a Forth history that has one Forth code listing containing the word "atoms" and a quote from Moore saying in effect "The Lisp influence is evident." I think that the article may have originated from a Rochester Forth Conference discussion. -Wil Blake
- Previous message (by thread): Language extensibility (was: Why is tcl broken?)
- Next message (by thread): Language extensibility (was: Why is tcl broken?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list