Python Performance
Greg Ward
gward at cnri.reston.va.us
Wed Jul 21 17:44:44 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Jul 21 17:44:44 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Python Performance
- Next message (by thread): Python Performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sreekant kodela <sreekantk at freenet.co.uk> wrote: > - Is there anyway I can improve the performance of python code. It depends what the performance problem you're worried about is. If you're concerned about startup overhead of CGI scripts (and you should be), then Python is certainly guilty, but a damn sight better than a certain other popular scripting language widely used for CGI programming (mainly because Python caches compiled bytecode files). Apart from PyApache, one possibility is Persistent CGI, which arose in Zope-land. Andrew Kuchling recently wrote an Apache module (mod_pcgi.c) for this, see ftp://starship.python.net/pub/crew/amk/new/. Sounds like a good idea, but I've never used it. If you're concerned about runtime performance -- ie. how long it takes to mangle strings and loop over lists and so forth -- I wouldn't worry about it. Yes, Python is slow, but the Internet is so much slower that it hardly matters. Greg -- Greg Ward <gward at cnri.reston.va.us> Corporation for National Research Initiatives, Reston, VA, USA http://starship.python.net/~gward/
- Previous message (by thread): Python Performance
- Next message (by thread): Python Performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list