Why are index() and count() only for mutable sequences?
Gerrit Holl
gerrit.holl at pobox.com
Thu Jul 8 16:41:10 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 8 16:41:10 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Why are index() and count() only for mutable sequences?
- Next message (by thread): Why are index() and count() only for mutable sequences?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 09:09:44PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 21:09:44 +0200 > From: "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal at lemburg.com> > To: Bob Alexander <bobalex at ix.netcom.com> > Cc: python-list at python.org > Subject: Re: Why are index() and count() only for mutable sequences? > > Bob Alexander wrote: > > > > There is no modification of the sequence performed by these functions > > -- it seems as though they could be available for all sequences. It > > would certainly be useful for tuples as well as lists (strings, too, > > for that matter, even though we have the more general string.find()). > > You could try count(), index(), forall() and exists() from mxTools: > > http://starship.skyport.net/~lemburg/mxTools.html > > Albeit, they work with conditions (functions that return 1/0) to > implement the testing process. > Is this an anwser?? He asked: "why"... regards, Gerrit. -- The Dutch Linuxgames homepage: http://linuxgames.nl.linux.org Personal homepage: http://www.nl.linux.org/~gerrit/ Discoverb is a python program (in several languages) which tests the words you learned by asking it. Homepage: http://www.nl.linux.org/~gerrit/discoverb/ Oh my god! They killed init! You bastards!
- Previous message (by thread): Why are index() and count() only for mutable sequences?
- Next message (by thread): Why are index() and count() only for mutable sequences?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list