Maintainability (was Re: Stackless & String-processing)
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at compaq.com
Sun Jul 25 16:35:53 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Jul 25 16:35:53 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Maintainability (was Re: Stackless & String-processing)
- Next message (by thread): Maintainability (was Re: Stackless & String-processing)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ivan Van Laningham wrote: > > Any reason it couldn't be done? If I remember rightly, Guido's position last time was that doing it the long-winded way wasn't enough of a hardship to make it worth adding another language construct. Not to mention another keyword, which as we all know would cause the universe to collapse into a quantum singularity if done prior to Python 2.0. Greg
- Previous message (by thread): Maintainability (was Re: Stackless & String-processing)
- Next message (by thread): Maintainability (was Re: Stackless & String-processing)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list