Scientific Plotting?
Robert Kern
kernr at mail.ncifcrf.gov
Tue Jul 20 21:43:48 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jul 20 21:43:48 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Scientific Plotting?
- Next message (by thread): Scientific Plotting?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 18:02:01 PDT, "Michael Huster" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote: >I am also trying to find an adequate *object* based plotting package. I am >writing some signal processing software and want to code plotting into the >classes I am defining. [snip] >Gnuplot: Runs gnuplot through a pipe. All of the data (upto many MB) also >has to go through the pipe. Unsat. I want to plot efficiently. The Gnuplot module as updated by Michael Haggerty (http://monsoon.harvard.edu/~mhagger/download/) puts the data into temporary files. Pipes are used for commands only. If you haven't used it recently, you might want to try it again. [snip] >Piddle & graphite: looks good, but not mature enough. We are keeping an eye >on it. Probably will try it. True, they're not quite mature enough for a lot of work. However, since there don't seem to be many other contenders available for you, banging on Graphite and PIDDLE to add the capabilities you need might be faster. >PyMat: I want to get away from needing Matlab licenses > >I am kind of bummed. If we wrap intelligent python wrappers around >something, we will post it. Hope your problems get solved! >Michael Huster >mhuster at hotmail.com Robert Kern | ----------------------|"In the fields of Hell where the grass grows high This space | Are the graves of dreams allowed to die." intentionally | - Richard Harter left blank. |
- Previous message (by thread): Scientific Plotting?
- Next message (by thread): Scientific Plotting?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list