1.5.2 for: else:
William Tanksley
wtanksle at dolphin.openprojects.net
Thu Jul 29 13:10:19 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 29 13:10:19 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): 1.5.2 or: else:
- Next message (by thread): 1.5.2 for: else:
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:51:15 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: >Gordon McMillan wrote: >> But finding a match in a list, and testing whether you >> fell off the end without finding one, is (without the else clause) a >> much messier proposal. >Not if you go about it the right way. I always >put such loops in a procedure of their own, >and use return: >Not only does this not require a weird else >clause, it doesn't require break either. I >almost never use break - and when I do I usually >regret it later. I wouldn't mind if there weren't >any break - and without break, there would be no >need for the weird else. I have to admit that I do the same -- this is why I've never been tripped up by the else. >Greg -- -William "Billy" Tanksley
- Previous message (by thread): 1.5.2 or: else:
- Next message (by thread): 1.5.2 for: else:
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list