1.5.2 for: else:
William Tanksley
wtanksle at dolphin.openprojects.net
Tue Jul 27 17:17:08 EDT 1999
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jul 27 17:17:08 EDT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): 1.5.2 for: else:
- Next message (by thread): 1.5.2 for: else:
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 14:29:43 +0200, Thomas Wouters wrote: >On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 04:15:44PM +0400, Oleg Broytmann wrote: >> The following program: >> ---------- >> for a in ['a', 12]: >> print a >> else: >> print "Empty!" >> ---------- >http://www.python.org/doc/current/tut/node6.html#SECTION006200000000000000000 >4.4 break and continue Statements, and else Clauses on Loops >Loop statements may have an else clause; it is executed when the loop >terminates through exhaustion of the list (with for) or when the condition >becomes false (with while), but not when the loop is terminated by a break >statement. Well, I'm suprised. I had also expected the else clause to run on empty loop. It seems so natural, in line with the meaning of a loop (loop on this; otherwise do that). Fortunately I've never actually used it and thus been disenchanted. Understanding the current semantics seems to require understanding the nature of loop tests in Python. Since I understand them I can agree that this makes sense, but I'm still a bit leery, because you're not 'elsing' on the data but rather on code inside the loop. I would _definitely_ use exceptions to handle this. >Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> -- -William "Billy" Tanksley
- Previous message (by thread): 1.5.2 for: else:
- Next message (by thread): 1.5.2 for: else:
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list