The Simple Economics of Open Source
Marc Spitzer
marc at oscar.noc.cv.net
Tue Apr 25 10:32:02 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Apr 25 10:32:02 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): The Simple Economics of Open Source
- Next message (by thread): The Simple Economics of Open Source
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <vndya62ykbi.fsf at camelot-new.ccs.neu.edu>, Justin Sheehy wrote: >Raffael Cavallaro <raffael at mediaone.net> writes: > >> Fact is, only commodity items, that are known to many programmers, are >> open sourced. If there were sufficient demand to support a closed source >> business, then it would have happened that way. The proof of this is the >> BSDs, which would allow a closed source, proprietary fork at any time. >> Hasn't happened 'cause there's no demand for such a product. > >You mean like BSD/OS, from BSDI? > >It happened 9 years ago, and they've been selling it ever since. > >Interesting "proof" you have there. > >-Justin > this sounds like a religious argument, be carful when you show evadence that contradicts the 1 true faith. marc > >
- Previous message (by thread): The Simple Economics of Open Source
- Next message (by thread): The Simple Economics of Open Source
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list