Questions on 1.6a2's string methods
Michael Hudson
mwh21 at cam.ac.uk
Fri Apr 14 04:22:56 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Apr 14 04:22:56 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Questions on 1.6a2's string methods
- Next message (by thread): Debugging with IDLE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think weve had all these discussions recently. Manus Hand <mjhand at concentric.net> writes: > 1. I see that string objects now support (as methods) most of the > functions from the string module. Among these are: > upper, lower, split, strip, find > and surely others. My question is, why is capwords (which seems > to be in the same genre as upper and lower) not a method? Start here: http://x28.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/viewthread.xp?AN=586654400&recnum=%3cm3snysor7o.fsf at atrus.jesus.cam.ac.uk%3e%231/1 Conclusion: the "missing methods" might get implemented, if someone gets round to it. THe unicode string type has more methods (it has center, ljust, rjust). > 2. Along these same lines, since split() became a method of the > string type, wouldn't it make sense to make join() a method of > the list type? Start here: http://x29.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/viewthread.xp?AN=588318989 Conclusion: nothing obvious, but the status quo seems the most likely (& best - to me) winner. > 3. Are the classlike standard types (list, dictionary, and now > string) equipped with a __dict__ attribute? I can see the names > of all functions supported by a user-defined class by saying > className.__dict__.keys(), but I cannot see the list of methods > for the string type (at least not in the same way). Thus my > need to ask silly questions like #1 above (maybe capwords is > there by some other name??) No, but they ways that always worked still work <wink>: >>> dir('') ['capitalize', 'center', 'count', 'endswith', 'expandtabs', 'find', 'index', 'isdigit', 'islower', 'isspace', 'istitle', 'isupper', 'join', 'ljust', 'lower', 'lstrip', 'replace', 'rfind', 'rindex', 'rjust', 'rstrip', 'split', 'splitlines', 'startswith', 'strip', 'swapcase', 'title', 'translate', 'upper'] >>> dir(u'') ['capitalize', 'center', 'count', 'encode', 'endswith', 'expandtabs', 'find', 'index', 'isdecimal', 'isdigit', 'islower', 'isnumeric', 'isspace', 'istitle', 'isupper', 'join', 'ljust', 'lower', 'lstrip', 'replace', 'rfind', 'rindex', 'rjust', 'rstrip', 'split', 'splitlines', 'startswith', 'strip', 'swapcase', 'title', 'translate', 'upper'] >>> ''.__methods__ ['capitalize', 'center', 'count', 'endswith', 'expandtabs', 'find', 'index', 'isdigit', 'islower', 'isspace', 'istitle', 'isupper', 'join', 'ljust', 'lower', 'lstrip', 'replace', 'rfind', 'rindex', 'rjust', 'rstrip', 'split', 'splitlines', 'startswith', 'strip', 'swapcase', 'title', 'translate', 'upper'] No, no capwords. HTH, M. -- languages shape the way we think, or don't. -- Erik Naggum, comp.lang.lisp
- Previous message (by thread): Questions on 1.6a2's string methods
- Next message (by thread): Debugging with IDLE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list