Adding new math operators
Huaiyu Zhu
hzhu at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Aug 4 19:51:06 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Aug 4 19:51:06 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Adding new math operators
- Next message (by thread): Adding new math operators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 04 Aug 2000 05:56:31 GMT, Jeff Petkau <jpet at eskimo.com> wrote: >... >> Examples: >> b = a.I ~- a.I ~* u ~/ (c.I ~+ v~/a~*u) ~* v ~/ a >> z = sin(x~**2 ~+ y~**2) > >Gah. As much as I wish for more operators sometimes, I >think this would have the Perl folks laughing at us for >programming in line noise. And given how much discussion >and thought went into this proposal, I'm not sure it's possible >to do any better as long as you're restricted to ASCII. A little clarification: these two examples only arise when you are using a class that is of the opposite flavor (element vs object). If the standard op is of the desired flavor, all the ~ go away, and you get b = a.I - a.I * u / (c.I + v/a*u) * v / a z = sin(x**2 + y**2) The alternative op only occur in mixed situations. Whether this is line noise or not, it's so much better than b = sub(inv(a),div(mul(div(mul(inv(a),u),add(inv(c),mul(div(v,a),u))),v),a)) (Could anybody verify whether this is correct?) As for Perl, I wouldn't even dream of doing numerical computation there. Certainly I wouldn't substitute two lines of line noise with 60 lines of line noise, let alone running in slow motion. Perl only functions as glue language, you still need real applications to do the real thing (except text related tasks). >And now for something completely different: > >What if there were no new operators, no new syntax, but >instead a new module that used excessive cleverness to >translate Python expressions into MathML, which was >then displayed in emacs/Idle/PythonWin as Real Math? Though I love to use markup languages for typesetting, I wouldn't use them for programming. You are looking at the source code most of the time instead of whatever transformed results. Only WYSIWYG works for programs. Yes, I agree the root of the problem is that ascii is too antiquated. But given the available resources, I'd claim that the proposal in the PEP is the least of all evils. then-you'd-expect-me-to-say-that-ly yr's Huaiyu
- Previous message (by thread): Adding new math operators
- Next message (by thread): Adding new math operators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list