xreadlines (was Re: while true: !!!)
Jeff Epler
jepler at inetnebr.com
Fri Dec 15 08:58:47 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Dec 15 08:58:47 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): xreadlines (was Re: while true: !!!)
- Next message (by thread): xreadlines (was Re: while true: !!!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:14:38 +0100, Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> wrote: >...if it was able to iterate over already-opened file-like objects, rather >than having to open actual files itself, it WOULD conceptually solve it >all. I wonder how hard it would be to generalize fileinput in this way -- >probably not very (the in-place-rewriting option would be incompatible >with having already-opened file-like objects in the list, of course). xreadlines takes a file object, not a filename, as its argument. >If [using readline] was a performance problem, it could of course >also be fixed in a future fileinput version without changing code that >uses it (again, in-place-rewriting would probably have to inhibit the >optimization, although that isn't entirely clear). xreadlines internally uses fp.readlines(sizehint), so for line in xreadlines.xreadlines(fp): pass is just about as fast as for line in fp.readlines(): pass except that it will not require storage for the whole file. Jeff
- Previous message (by thread): xreadlines (was Re: while true: !!!)
- Next message (by thread): xreadlines (was Re: while true: !!!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list