Python vs. PHP (& Java?)
Thomas Wouters
thomas at xs4all.net
Wed Dec 27 05:00:37 EST 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Dec 27 05:00:37 EST 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. PHP (& Java?)
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. PHP (& Java?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 10:03:05PM -0800, Ben Ocean wrote: > I’m an intermediate-level programmer that’s new to Python (via Zope) and I > like it a lot. However, it appears to me that, while Python is a good > replacement for Perl, it cannot replace much of the functionality of PHP, > which can be scripted into HTML (whereas Python, it appears, must be > called). So, I have to wonder about the speed of Python vs. PHP for > Internet-based applications. Python has the advantage of byte-code and > compilation, but it’s server-side. PHP might not be as fast on the server, > but it doesn’t have to make as many trips back and forth between server > and client. Plus, I’m curious as to why Python wasn’t written in such a > way that it could be written directly into HTML documents like PHP. You don't need roundtrips with Python either, you just need to start it as a CGI script (which is some additional overhead, granted.) And note that there are several extentions (PSP, ASP and if-I-recall-correctly mod_snake for apache, and Zope's DTML) that allow embedding Python into HTML. As for why Python isn't PHP, well, because it isn't. Python is a fair bit older than PHP, and simply wasn't intended as an 'html-embedded-language'. It was intended as a proper, easy to learn, easy to read, efficient (from the programmers view) language, and not as a quick-and-dirty-hack to allow code inbetween HTML :) The WWW and HTML did exist, but were only just starting, when Python emerged. And then there's two other points. I do a reasonable amount of PHP, and I think it sucks :) I don't see a terribly good reason to mix HTML and script code, for one. It looks sexy but there isn't a real advantage, and it only serves to clutter the code, IMHO. And besides that I've been bitten by irregularities in PHP code way too often, like how you can pass environment variables to the html page which end up variables inside the script -- that's been the cause of several huge security issues for me. So even if you really want to embed code into HTML, I'd go for Python (or even Perl!) rather than PHP. > On a similar subject, someone once informed me that Java was by far the > best language for scripting communication programs over the Internet (like > chat, IRC, etc.). How does Python compare? Your comments are appreciated. Well, not suprising (since this is a Python newsgroup/list, not a Java one) I don't agree. Python is easier to write and easier to read (and understand), and way easier to learn. Python is (supposedly :) slower than Java in execution, but especially in networked environments, where you spend most of your time waiting for the network anyway, you aren't going to notice that. And besides, Python is so easy, you can learn it pretty quickly (in a few hours if you're already a somewhat-experienced programmer) and I doubt you'll ever regret it. If anything, it'll be a good programming learning experience. And it's just a fraction of the time you'll spend learning Java :) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. PHP (& Java?)
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. PHP (& Java?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list